Very similar results surprisingly. I was hoping the BitBlit S->S copy would be faster but no. The SNAP driver is very slow at that but very fast at DIVE whereas the Panorama driver is a bit quicker at the BitBlit but a lot slower at DIVE.
Sysbench results for nVidia 9800 GT
SNAP: Graphics BitBlt S->S copy : 0.976 Million pixels/second BitBlt M->S copy : 520.853 Million pixels/second Filled Rectangle : 1013.440 Million pixels/second Pattern Fill : 328.095 Million pixels/second Vertical Lines : 31.387 Million pixels/second Horizontal Lines : 176.399 Million pixels/second Diagonal Lines : 50.864 Million pixels/second Text Render : 245.515 Million pixels/second ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total : 101.970 PM-Graphics-marks Direct Interface to video extensions - DIVE Video bus bandwidth : 2023.626 Megabytes/second DIVE fun : 6694.443 fps normalised to 640x480x256 M->S, DD, 1.00:1 : 6905.453 fps normalised to 640x480x256 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total : 2566.445 DIVE-marks PANORAMA: Graphics BitBlt S->S copy : 54.842 Million pixels/second BitBlt M->S copy : 52.631 Million pixels/second Filled Rectangle : 103.825 Million pixels/second Pattern Fill : 90.464 Million pixels/second Vertical Lines : 11.807 Million pixels/second Horizontal Lines : 17.150 Million pixels/second Diagonal Lines : 15.157 Million pixels/second Text Render : 36.958 Million pixels/second ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total : 36.390 PM-Graphics-marks Direct Interface to video extensions - DIVE Video bus bandwidth : 228.038 Megabytes/second DIVE fun : 777.134 fps normalised to 640x480x256 M->S, DD, 1.00:1 : 778.796 fps normalised to 640x480x256 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Total : 290.942 DIVE-marks